On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 09:14:55AM -0700, Ben Kevan wrote: > On Wednesday 10 October 2007 06:35:31 am Sylvester Lykkehus wrote: > > Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > > On Oct 9 2007 20:45, Ben Kevan wrote: > > >> What's the changes of us getting a suse built build service for the > > >> 2.6.23 kernel to help utilize the new scheduler? > > > > > > chances -> not gonna happen too soon I presume (based on previous > > > evidence). 10.3 got delivered with a fairly recent kernel (2.6.22), so it > > > might come that 2.6.24 is the first to appear on the suse side. This is > > > how it happened with 2.6.18(10.2)->2.6.20. > > > > A bit off-topic > > Jan: > > Are you planning on continuing building kernel RPMS with the ccj > > patchset for _10.2_ in the future, or will you be focusing on 10.3 ? > > > > Best regards > > Ok, if it doesn't seem that 2.6.23 will be released as a build service for > 10.3, will the Scheduler Patch be allied and updated to the 2.6.22 branch?
I do not think so. Ciao, Marcus -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
