Rajko M. wrote: > On Thursday 11 October 2007 07:01:08 pm Richard Creighton wrote: > > >> Thanks for pointing out the error, indirectly the bug and an idea for a >> useful exploit that may come in handy next time we get a kernel with an >> oops built in as an update. >> > > I would not rely on bug. > It will be corrected as soon as someone report it. > Oh, I've learned not to count on anything, but I will keep an old kernel around as a 'sacrificial lamb' so when I see a kernel update available, I can offer it to the Yast T-Rex monster instead of the current, functioning, kernel. If T-Rex eats both, well, I'm no worse off than now and if it eats the sacrificial lamb instead of the good kernel, I will have a backup for a while longer. Hopefully it will become a 'feature' rather than a bug.
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
