On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 00:55 +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > The Tuesday 2007-10-16 at 18:36 -0400, Kenneth Schneider wrote: > > >> If the list Netiquette for this list is to reply to the List, why is the > >> Reply-To field set to the original author? > > > > Perhaps he, like me, got tired of all the duplicate emails (and set it > > that way in the client program) because some people simply use > > reply-to-all instead of reply-to-list. > > Er... if you set the Reply-To to the original author, you will still get > double mails. It might make sense if they set it to the list. > > Also, many people use reply to all simply because their client programs do > not have the reply to list function (mine doesn't). > >
Well, we all know there are still some lame client programs out there. In my case, if you looked, the reply-to is set to the list because _I_ got fed up receiving two emails when people replied to my posts. -- Ken Schneider UNIX since 1989, linux since 1994, SuSE since 1998 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
