On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 00:55 +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > The Tuesday 2007-10-16 at 18:36 -0400, Kenneth Schneider wrote: > > >> If the list Netiquette for this list is to reply to the List, why is the > >> Reply-To field set to the original author? > > > > Perhaps he, like me, got tired of all the duplicate emails (and set it > > that way in the client program) because some people simply use > > reply-to-all instead of reply-to-list. > > Er... if you set the Reply-To to the original author, you will still get > double mails. It might make sense if they set it to the list. > > Also, many people use reply to all simply because their client programs do > not have the reply to list function (mine doesn't). > > > - -- > Cheers, > Carlos E. R. > Seems to me that some people don't realize that a Reply-to-list function is not obvious to all. And those who aren't aware of the semi-"hidden" feature suffer the wrath of others.
In any case, obviously this has been an issue before I came along. I figure the best way to solve this is to submit an enhancement request for Evolution which I just did. https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=334428 -- ---Bryen--- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
