On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 11:19:27AM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > * Carlos E. R. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10-19-07 10:43]: > > No; the OP had two java versions, true, but the symlink was correct, in > > place. It was after a YOU security update that the symlink dissapeared. > > should not happen! > > > The updater should have mantained the same symlink as it found. The > > question of which java version to use is moot in that case. > > Guess I have never crossed that path. My updates seem to work > correctly whether for the currently used java version or the un-used > version..... > > My first step to diagnose the problem in that case would have been to > have tried "ls -la `which java`" in a console, and then again on the > result: > > 11:18 wahoo:~ > ls -la `which java` > rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 2006-08-23 19:13 /usr/bin/java -> > /etc/alternatives/java > 11:18 wahoo:~ > ls -la /etc/alternatives/java > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 35 2007-03-25 09:39 /etc/alternatives/java -> > /usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.5.0-sun/bin/java
There are several bugs open already and I hope we can release a bugfix early next week. Ciao, Marcus -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
