-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

* Carlos E. R. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10-19-07 10:43]:
> No; the OP had two java versions, true, but the symlink was correct, in 
> place. It was after a YOU security update that the symlink dissapeared. 

 should not happen!

> The updater should have mantained the same symlink as it found. The 
> question of which java version to use is moot in that case.

Guess I have never crossed that path.  My updates seem to work
correctly whether for the currently used java version or the un-used
version.....

My first step to diagnose the problem in that case would have been to
have tried "ls -la `which java`" in a console, and then again on the
result:

11:18 wahoo:~ > ls -la `which java`
rwxrwxrwx  1 root root 22 2006-08-23 19:13 /usr/bin/java -> 
/etc/alternatives/java
11:18 wahoo:~ > ls -la /etc/alternatives/java
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root 35 2007-03-25 09:39 /etc/alternatives/java -> 
/usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.5.0-sun/bin/java

- -- 
Patrick Shanahan         Plainfield, Indiana, USA        HOG # US1244711
http://wahoo.no-ip.org     Photo Album:  http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
Registered Linux User #207535                    @ http://counter.li.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn4472 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHGMr/ClSjbQz1U5oRAgY8AKCELtQyQOWcVYeSvn/PKjxWBLiJCACcCZKv
iHpOSLHCKnk+oMqPzbJQs6g=
=w41t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to