On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 09:38 -0500, Bryen wrote: > On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 09:31 -0500, Ness, Todd wrote: > > I believe the issues is why are we being told we have a mandatory update > > of opera on a system we do not have opera installed on? > > Exactly! > > I sent my screenshot of the updater and results from running zypper lu > to Andreas directly since I'm not supposed to post attachments to the > list here. > > I also included the rpm -qa | grep Opera and rpm -qa | grep opera > commands to prove that I do not have opera installed on my system. > > Saying that this mandatory update is needed for other components other > than Opera doesn't help matters much. If we are indeed security > conscious, then it is up to us to question the security of a security > update. Calling it Opera when you don't have opera installed rings a > heck of alot of bells. :-)
It looks like yast-gtk is defaulting to showing "all available patches" instead of only applicable packages, we're poking it. -JP -- JP Rosevear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Novell, Inc. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
