On 10/30/07, Patrick Shanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > * BandiPat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10-30-07 11:54]: > [...] > > Moving to full 64bit should indeed be a better choice, you would > > think, yet many of apps & plugins are still 32bit only. > > I believe that this is fluff and not fact. There are a few apps which > only have 32bit plug-ins for certain capabilities, ie: I still run > 32bit firefox and plug-ins and 32bit java. But *everything* else on > my 10.1 system *is* 64bit. > > > It's a vexing question, but for now I'm staying with 32bit. > > Your choice! BUT it is not based on your experience, only perception. > > - -- > Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA HOG # US1244711 > http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 > Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://counter.li.org > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn4472 (GNU/Linux) >
What I would really like to see is a 64-bit user group that quantifies exactly what doesn't work and uses that list to communicate with developers to encourage them to produce a functioning 64-bit whatever. Right now, I don't have solid information to make an informed decision. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
