On Sun, 2007-11-25 at 08:19 -0600, Rajko M. wrote: > On Sunday 25 November 2007 07:24:55 am Bryen wrote: > > > For Yast developers, they may have assumed that the problem is because > > of the current look and feel and that it needed to be changed somehow. > > In fact, what has happened is that instead of complaining about the look > > and feel, we've said "No, the look and feel is just fine. It > > is ....(fill in the blank)... that is the problem." That's far more > > valuable feedback for the survey than you may think. > > > > I'll restate my earlier posting here. A survey is about finding out > > what people think/perceive and whether those thoughts/perceptions were > > similar to what the surveyor thought/perceived. This survey has taken > > on an entirely different animal than what appears to have been intended > > in the literal translation of the original post. Nevertheless, you > > can't say that it is wrong. In my nearly 2 months here, this is the > > first time I've seen such vigorous debate about Yast, and that has to be > > a good thing no matter what. > > Sincerely, where do you read survey ;-) > You don't have to see the word "survey" to be intelligent enough to understand it is implied.
Here's the definition of "survey": "to take a general or comprehensive view of or appraise, as a situation, area of study, etc." That's exactly what this thread is. But I know you were just saying that in jest because I have seen your writings in the past and know you are intelligent enough to have known it was a survey. Thanks for adding some jocularity to the thread. :-) -- ---Bryen--- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
