-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
The Tuesday 2007-11-27 at 10:03 +0100, Clayton wrote:
And I would also appreciate if all yast interfaces (qt, gtk, ncurses) had
the same functionality, behaviour, and approximate look. I understand you
only ask about qt interface now, but nevertheless, please consider that.
This is a big issue to me. The recent Gnomification of parts of YAST
and the resulting totally different (parts of the) YAST user interface
in Gnome vs KDE was an issue I raised and was subsequently shot down.
There is a trick in a bugzilla to make the gnome version use the kde
version of YOU. Ie, all YaST is gnome style, except YOU, which is pretty
unusable in gnome style. If you can't find it, I'll post it here.
I can't seem to express how important a GUI agnostic YAST is to me.
YAST as a common tool regardless of GUI selected is a major strength.
I really want to see that remain the case... that with any changes to
the UI... be it tabs, text, all icons in one big panel or whatever,
that the changes be applied consistently and are the same regardless
of the end user choice of Gnome, Enlightenment, KDE etc.
Absolutely. And text mode too: text mode is used a lot by administrators
of servers, probably headless. Don't forget YaST in text mode.
To sum it up, When the changes are made, please do not create two
maintenance paths with one style for KDE, one for Gnome etc. Make it
a common interface.
Absolutely.
I can accept different external appearance, but the menus and all the
functionality must be basically the same.
- --
Cheers,
Carlos E. R.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76
iD8DBQFHTBkmtTMYHG2NR9URAg1DAJ0UjTKMHslp7ioPTnrUzKepEf9ongCdEkJU
qYbhz3/uMFrPqQdMIW6WlIY=
=IDdj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
