On Tuesday 11 December 2007 23:06:48 Linda Walsh wrote: > I can't see why one wouldn't turn on this logging in > run levels 2 & 3? Wouldn't it equally make sense to start syslog > early if network destinations are absent?
I don't know what the reasoning was, but from the bug report I mentioned, I'm sure there was one, that it was not an oversight. Perhaps because X gets started, there was a worry that the log buffer would get overflowed and the system would lose log items before they had a chance to get written to disk?! I don't know Anders -- Madness takes its toll -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
