On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 23:54 +0100, Wolfgang Woehl wrote: > Donnerstag, 20. Dezember 2007 Hans Witvliet: > > > Many years ago i used a RT-os, > > But when seeing you asking for videodrivers and vmware...... > > > > For real RT-applications, you should want to avoid unneeded IRQ's at all > > time: barebone, no graphics (but serial console), no virtualisation, no > > add-on hardware and as much as possible unneeded io on your mobo > > disabled. > > On linux kernels you can sort and prioritize IRQ's. They're called "Interrupt > requests" for a reason. > > If the realtime infrastructure is up and healthy then there's really no > reason > for your realtime applications to not deliver -- no matter what is going on > on your desktop. > > Well, the rt-application could suck, for that matter. Multiple rt-action > might > drain ressources. Hell, the metal could run hot :) And I don't know about > hardware level virtualization and its effects on irq handling. > > Wolfgang > > ps: What was the OS/application you were using?
Yes, well, i have to agree with the O.P. Some applications do need a graphical interface, But to use vmware on a rt-machine because the hardware is not supported by linux.... Well, i don't know. Probably it is not possible to seperate these functions into a seperate box.. For what i was using R.T.? The OS was (a cloned) mtos, and was used for frequency analysis (dtmf and dialtone recognition) for telefone exchanges, back in 85. hw -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
