Greg Freemyer wrote: > If I did that, what would be the best choice of filesystem? ReiserFS? > I know it has been optimized for lots of small files, but I'm not > sure about the couple million in one directory scenario.
As far as filesystem performance in your given scenario, reiserfs is likely the best choice, as others have mentioned. For maximum performance, mount that filesystem without acls or xattrs, use the "-notail" mount option, and most importantly, use the "-noatime" mount option. Joe -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
