Greg Freemyer wrote:
On Jan 5, 2008 1:50 PM, Peter Sjoberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I had similar questions a while ago and did take the time to do some
bonnie++ benchmarking that I saved at
http://www.techwiz.ca/~peters/File_Benchmark.html
And as many others already pointed out, for millions of files it seems
like reiserfs is the best one to go with.
Besides the numbers there I also have the scripts (and logs) I used to
do the testing and they can be used to do your own testing.
/ps
Thanks Peter,
I've already done enough testing to know it is literally hundreds (or
thousands) of times faster than NTFS locally from Win2003.
Man..that is pathetically sad.. that a network-connected
filesystem beats their own filesystem on a local disk.
Now I need to add a Linux network client connected via samba / cifs.
And finally a Win2003 client. That is what I'm actually trying to accelerate.
I think you misspelled "Lose2003"
Greg
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
