> definitely needs to be in the default install. Most users will want > Beagle.
How do you figure that? Maybe once Beagle works a bit better it should be in the default install, but right now... given its horrible performance (for a large number of people), I would say Beagle should not be in the default install... at all. Optional... sure... but default? When I am doing phone support for a new user... and I do a fair bit of remote install guidance with openSUSE.... I get the novice user to do a default install... that includes Beagle. In every single case, I have been called back with the question, "why is this Linux so slow?" In every single case, I've instructed them to remove Beagle and the problem was solved. In fact now (in the last couple of months) for those novice installs, I simply tell them to remove Beagle right at the start to save me the phone call later complaining about the computer performance. So, this is not just one particular hardware config that is problematic. This is over many systems... AMD and Intel CPUs... RAM from 510MB up to 4Gb.... many different motherboard brands... some systems with only high speed SATA drives, others with older IDE drives. I have yet to see any common and obvious factor between all these computers and Beagle's performance... or lack thereof. C. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
