On Monday 28 January 2008 05:44:17 pm Fred A. Miller wrote: > Carl Hartung wrote: > > On Mon January 28 2008 10:01:25 pm Stevens wrote: > >> Carl: > >> > >> Understand that Al Gore, a corrupt American politician who is > >> also dumb as a rock, will make tons of money off of people > >> stupid enough to go along with his scam. There is a difference > >> between pollution and global warming.
How absolutely pitifully true. Still, if something is actually accomplished, perhaps we can get a portion of it back with some tax... > >> Our 0.15% contribution > >> to greenhouse gasses does nothing to warm the planet that is as asinine are Gore's propaganda. Where on earth is there space for some truth? > >> but does > >> lots to foul our nest. Please keep those two things separate perhaps you want to wait for a pollution documentary alone before anything gets done about that? perhaps then you can just divert attention to the shortcomings of the messenger again? > >> as > >> you watch this video: > >> > >> http://www.aconvenientfiction.com/inconvenient3.html > > > > These people also produced a documentary asserting that breast implants > > were GOOD for women. What credentials! Mainstream media and government have had decades of opportunity to objectively present the true cost of various aspects of our technology. When "non professionals" try to undertake the task, there is much more roughness and error in the message. To just take the ridicule route or to say "it is not proven harmful yet" are extremely negative approaches, driven by anything but conservatism. There is nothing conservative if your doctor tells you that since you have no lung cancer, you could keep on smoking, why / how would it be conservative to use exactly the same reasoning and words about global warming? > > Then came "Against Nature," a > > documentary which aired on the BBC which then had to issue a public > > apology for showing it. > > > > Get some SCIENCE not blather, Fred. And PLEASE post to the list! I absolutely agree. Yet it is a fact that the time scale for the real science re global warming is not exactly defined yet. And is is absolutely ludicrous that the likes of you refuse to err on the side of caution while the science actually goes about it's sciencing. Should YOU be wrong, a simple "sorry" would definitely not do in 5, 10 or 20 years. Should the likes of Gore be wrong, we could always "off with their head or their money or both", our grandchildren would actually get a little bigger share of "our" oil and they might even get a chance to visit some remote south pacific atoll before the sea covers it. wannabe a real conservative? dimitris <small clip...> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
