Actually I like his idea for the reasons he outlined. I hope that this isn't
too offtopic for the list. But your point about band-aiding a bad design is
fair but I think his reasons for wanting the structure to be flexible now
are reasonable also. If you take a look at his sites I think it shows some
sense of good design.

I assume when he adds aliasing he'll also support the direct url so I don't
see how he'll have problems with search engines later as they will key off
the meta information and he'll simply support the urls or aliases produced
by the search engines.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken Egervari [eXtremePHP]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 8:32 PM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Velocity or JSP?


> I have to agree with Robert.  The 353.html approach, although easy to
> implement for the programmers, violates a lot of sound principles in
> information design.  If you site is bookmarked and indexed by a search
> engine, you are definitely going to have some problems (not to mention
just
> confusing the heck out of people).  Now that you have planning to do
> aliasing, you are just band-aiding a bad design.  There could have been
> better strategies to use from the beginning I would think though I won't
go
> into them here.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rickard Öberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 8:17 AM
> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Velocity or JSP?
>
>
> > Robert Nicholson wrote:
> > > What information is encoded in those URLS and why are they so cryptic?
> I'm
> > > just curoius about why you are using urls like that.
> >
> > As I said, the URL is the <page object id>.html. The reason is to allow
> > users to move pages around in the site structure without messing up
> > links and bookmarks.
> >
> > The next version will have support for optional human readable aliases
> > though, so one can have e.g. "products.html" instead.
> >
> > /Rickard
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > Welcome to geek heaven.
> > http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > _______________________________________________
> > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
> >
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
>



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork

Reply via email to