Joseph Ottinger wrote:
Well, note the quotes I used. "Correctness" can be taken a lot of ways.
What I was referring to was buzzword-compatible correctness, where the
comp sci grads are happy applying all of their new-found knowledge in ways
that end up making the product less usable. Between usability and
"correctness," I'll take usability.
I see. My interpretation of "correctness" contains a high degree of
"usability" :-)
This is sort of why I dislike the current xwork.xml structure - it's
"correct" but unusable. (Well, it's usable, but *I* wouldn't want to use
it.)
Agree completely.
As far as the validation... as long as the definition is clear, I'm happy.
Ok, good.
--
Rickard Ă–berg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senselogic
Got blog? I do. http://dreambean.com
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
