I don't understand why URLs need to have ".action" OR ".jsp". In my mind, direct requests to resources is okay for static files, but all action-related requests should flow through the action mappings.
*If* actions are always tied to a path (or paths), *and* there is a filter controller, then: a) Your URLs can be anything you want. b) You can use the same JSP as the view for multiple actions. I think in the latest design there is a View factory chain which produces a View class, just like for actions. A ".jsp" view should result in a JSP View class, which will just forward the request to a JSP page via a RequestDispatcher. In servlet 2.3 (and by default in 2.4), a forward this way will *not* go through the filter chain again. This de-facto prevents against public requests to your jsp view pages--they can only be run by the controller. -Chris ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
