Bruce Ritchie wrote:
I'm with Pat here .. I actually prefer having urls with the .action in them to having pages with <ww:action> tags in them.But I didn't suggest that you'd use <action> tags... that was the WW way, and it worked, but with the filter it's much more transparent and the security problem with .action's is gone.
> For one thing, they
perform better. Another reason is that I have the same situation as Pat, the same jsp is the success page for multiple actions. One final reason is that the migration path from ww to xw for applications now requires filters to handle the (automatic) migration from the old .action urls to the new jsp only urls.I guess it would be possible to add .action support as well, but if it's possible to avoid I think we should, for reasons mentioned (hiding implementation, security).
/Rickard
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
