Check the messages I posted. What if we made ALL ActionConfigs based on Commands, with an optional default command mapped to the execute() method if you give your Action element a name attribute (which is an alias). Then you can also add more commands to your action with different execute methods and alias's.
I think this would be VERY cool, and we could drop the Action Interface requirement... Jason > -----Original Message----- > From: Patrick Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 1:10 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] re: some suggestion about ww2.0 > > > OK, two things: > > 1) The "command" piece should not be formally built in to the > configuration framework. I'm fine with it being part of > ActionSupport and the "command" param being passed through, > but I don't want to see it built in to the configuration > framework _unless_ it is also a feature that is core to XWork > (ie: not part of ActionSupport). > > 2) Having views based on exceptions should be easy to add. > I'll work on this. > > -Pat > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Matt Ho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 10:01 AM > Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] re: some suggestion about ww2.0 > > > > +1. > > > > Struts allows you declaratively handle exceptions. Initially, I > > really appreciated that feature, but I soon found that it made the > > managing exceptions a pain as there wasn't any runtime checking to > > ensure that all the exceptions had been caught. > > > > -- > > Matt Ho > > Principal > > Indigo Egg, Inc. > > http://www.indigoegg.com/ > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > On Behalf > > > Of Rickard Öberg > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 8:04 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] re: some suggestion about ww2.0 > > > > > > Anders Engström wrote: > > > > This is a functionality I miss in WW a lot. You can only specify > > views > > > > based on success, error, input etc (please correct me if I'm > > > > wrong). > > > > - but it would be very nice if you could select view based on > > Exception > > > > or user-defined return-values: > > > <snip> > > > > > > The idea is that if an exception is thrown from execute() it's a > > system > > > exception and not an application exception. I.e. you're > supposed to > > > catch all application exceptions and return some view string that > > > corresponds to the error message to be shown. > > > > > > /Rickard > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop > an edge. > > > The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use. Code > > > faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial. > > > www.slickedit.com/sourceforge > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop > an edge. The > > most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use. > Code faster. > > C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial. > > www.slickedit.com/sourceforge > > _______________________________________________ > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an > edge. The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can > use. Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE > 30-Day Trial. www.slickedit.com/sourceforge > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge. The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use. Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial. www.slickedit.com/sourceforge _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
