hi dick, thanks for your answer, now i dont have to worry if i misunderstood anything :-)
perhaps my problem could lead to a feature request instead, it would be very handy to be able to piece together a page using only <ww:include> tags and have them controlled by a front action (my usecase is that i am building a blog app, and i want to let users skin their own blogs like in roller, and here it would come in very handy) the custom tag you mention should try to map anythying on the valuestack (along with the httpRequest) to the action ,if i'm not mistaken. sincerely morten wilken ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dick Zetterberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 12:31 PM Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] webwork include question Hi Morten, That's correct, when you use the action tag it does not try to map the result to any view so what Patrick wrote would not work for you if you want that. Concerning the original question about the include and the parameters passed to it, that is also the correct behaviour. The include is made by using the servlet request dispatcher and it passes on the http request.to the included resource. If you want to hide the original parameters perhaps you could create your own include tag and in that tag use a ServletRequestWrapper that hides the original parameters? Cheers, Dick Zetterberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Morten Wilken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 11:10 AM Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] webwork include question > hi patrick, > i did try that, but it doesn't seem to include the success jsp from the > calendar.action > > i can see that all the right methods get called, but i do not get any html > inserted into my page > > sincerely > morten wilken > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Patrick Lightbody" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 2:02 AM > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] webwork include question > > > > We do a very similar thing... but with the ww:action tag. Why not use > that? > > > > -Pat > > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
