So how would you indicate this from the action class (you might want to have a SUCCESS and NO_CONTENT result)? IMO the result code NO_CONTENT should be supported.
Why do you want to have a new result type for this? Sounds like the action will know too much about how it is used that way.
If I wanted to use the action in both view and non-view ways I'd use two different action mappings for it. If I wanted to use both view and non-view *at the same time*, hence requiring both SUCCCESS and NO_CONTENT mappings simultaneously I'd do NO_CONTENT as an action-specific result value. Introducing it as a standard result doesn't seem necessary.
Mathias, do you have an example of why you'd want both SUCCESS and NO_CONTENT simultaneously?
/Rickard
-- Rickard Öberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senselogic
Got blog? I do. http://dreambean.com
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
