I've been looking at Picocontainer and Nanocontainer, and I like it. I think it provides a better approach to IOC than the enabler interfaces because of:
- no more enabler interface (this has a negative side also, different UML diagrams) - hides the component logic even more - no more setter - a component cannot be constructed without the other component (good!) - only one constructor possible (means all components defined are *required*, this is good and bad) - do null asserts in the constructor - dependency on small external project maintained by a group of very talented people
IMO we should migrate Xwork.
What do you guys think?
I just looked through the PicoContainer description, and it seems as though all my concerns with Type 2 IoC are resolved. In other words, I think it's brilliant and wouldn't mind at all if XWork used it.
/Rickard
-- Rickard Öberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senselogic
Got blog? I do. http://dreambean.com
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
