If you can send us some code we can take a look. Thanks! > -----Original Message----- > From: Tim Dwelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 2:19 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Decision: Xwork IoC > > > Not to make this decision any thornier than it already is... but... > > A couple of years ago, I wrote my own MVC framework called > Bebop. And Bebop contains a component container that > supports both constructor-based IoC and setter-based IoC. > Sure I'm biased, but I think its super cool... and I think it > would fit perfectly with WW. > > I had already been working on the 3.0 version of Bebop to > make the container pluggable into WW. But if you are looking > to "roll your own" anyhow... I was thinking that maybe I > could just contribute this code from Bebop, and then we work > together to customize it to meet XW/WW's needs? > > Whatever you decide, that's cool... but I just had to throw > it out there. > > -Tim. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft > Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more. > Download & eval WebKing and get a free book. > www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1 > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork >
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more. Download & eval WebKing and get a free book. www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1 _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
