Not that I know of... I'd be happy to help out.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthew E. Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 1:40 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Springframework & WW (Was - Re: [OS-webwork] Is This 
> a Bad Use of IoC?)
> 
> 
> Has springframework integration been started?
> 
> 
> Cheers,
>    matthew
> 
> On Friday, August 8, 2003, at 11:23 AM, Jason Carreira wrote:
> 
> > Yes, it will set up dependencies for you. No, I don't think it 
> > requires *Aware interfaces.
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Matthew E. Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 11:50 AM
> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Is This a Bad Use of IoC?
> >>
> >>
> >> Using Spring, will components automatically be passed to Actions 
> >> still?
> >>   Is there still going to be a need for *Aware interfaces?  Many 
> >> questions...
> >>
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>    matthew
> >>
> >>
> >> On Friday, August 8, 2003, at 10:26 AM, Jason Carreira wrote:
> >>
> >>> In the same way that we're going to have a Pico 
> integration for IoC, 
> >>> I'd like to have a Spring integration for IoC... But these need
> >> to be in an
> >>> add-on project for integrating other dependencies with
> >> Xwork / WebWork
> >>> outside of the main code base.
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Matthew E. Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>> Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 11:19 AM
> >>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Is This a Bad Use of IoC?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> What is the planned intergration with Spring?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>>    matthew
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thursday, August 7, 2003, at 08:57 PM, Jason Carreira wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I think we need to get the project for external
> >>>> integrations going. I
> >>>>> got a note from Rod Johnson about this too, and I think it
> >>>> would be a
> >>>>> great idea to have integrations with Spring and
> >> Picocontainer, but
> >>>>> these need to be in a separate project. We're 
> explicitly limiting 
> >>>>> dependencies in Xwork / WebWork as much as possible.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Jason
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>> From: Rob Rudin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 9:39 PM
> >>>>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Is This a Bad Use of IoC?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Not to sound like a broken record, but I think Spring does
> >>>> a nice job
> >>>>>> of handling Hibernate. It provides a Hibernate template to
> >>>> handle the
> >>>>>> Hibernate plumbing and nice support for configuring a
> >>>> SessionFactory.
> >>>>>> Should be very easy to hook this into WW2's IoC.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Rob
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>>>> From: "Matthew E. Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>>>> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 8:38 PM
> >>>>>> Subject: [OS-webwork] Is This a Bad Use of IoC?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I think I may be going Inversion of Control mad lately and
> >>>>>> need some
> >>>>>>> help sorting out if what I am doing is just wrong.  I am
> >>>> building a
> >>>>>>> new persistence manager where the core manager is based upon 
> >>>>>>> hibernate. The hibernate manager needs three different
> >>>>>> providers- one
> >>>>>>> for Configuration, one for SessionFactory, and one for
> >>>>>> Sessions.  Each
> >>>>>>> of these providers (Conf, SF, and Session) can have different 
> >>>>>>> implementations.  For example, the default Session
> >>>> provider always
> >>>>>>> returns a new session; however, there is also a
> >>>> ThreadLocal version
> >>>>>>> which returns the same session for the entire thread.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The question I have is how do I specify and load these at
> >>>> runtime?
> >>>>>>> The most obvious answer is to have a custom xml file that
> >>>> specifies
> >>>>>>> which provider fulfills each role.  I could write (and
> >>>> already have
> >>>>>>> done so) a loader to read an XML file and configure the
> >>>>>> system.  But,
> >>>>>>> instead of having this in a separate file, would it be
> >> a complete
> >>>>>>> bastardization of the intention of IoC (XWork edition) to
> >>>> use it to
> >>>>>>> automatically configure the providers?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Why does this seem bad?  Because the primary intention of
> >>>> IoC is to
> >>>>>>> wire business components whereas these providers will
> >>>>>> probably never
> >>>>>>> be used outside the real component, the persistence
> >>>>>> manager.  Instead,
> >>>>>>> it seems like I am too lazy to write a loader to configure
> >>>>>> the system.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>>>>    matthew
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>> This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET
> >>>>>> sites including
> >>>>>>> Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are
> >> available now.
> >>>>>>> Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet
> >>>>>> _072303_01/01
> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list 
> >>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>>
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>> This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites 
> >>>>>> including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums
> >>>> are available
> >>>>>> now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual
> >> Studio .NET.
> >>>>>> http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet
> >>>>> _072303_01/01 _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list 
> >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>> 
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET
> >>>> sites including
> >>>>> Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are 
> available now. 
> >>>>> Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. 
> >>>>> http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/
> >>>>> direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list 
> >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>> 
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites 
> >>>> including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are 
> >>>> available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual 
> >>>> Studio .NET. 
> >>>> http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet
> >>> _072303_01/01 _______________________________________________
> >>> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -------------------------------------------------------
> >>> This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET
> >> sites including
> >>> Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
> >>> Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
> >>> http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/
> >>> direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -------------------------------------------------------
> >> This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET 
> sites including
> >> Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
> >> Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
> >> http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet
> >> _072303_01/01
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
> >>
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET 
> sites including
> > Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
> > Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
> > http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/ 
> > direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
> > _______________________________________________
> > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
> Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
> Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
> http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet
> _072303_01/01
> _______________________________________________
> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
> 


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork

Reply via email to