I've thought about adding dependencies between validations (in other
words, only run these validations if that validation succeeds) but I
haven't had time to think about it too much... It could be a 1.1
feature, if there's interest.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patrick Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 10:26 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] conditional validation in ww2?
> 
> 
> I've done two actions in the past, but it does feel a bit yucky...
> 
> Just to expand on this request -- another reason it could be 
> useful is when you only want to validate a field if another 
> expression evaluates to true (such as a checkbox being set or 
> something).
> 
> -Pat
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
> Behalf Of Jason Carreira
> Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 5:54 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] conditional validation in ww2?
> 
> 2 Actions is the current way. I'm open to other ideas...
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Taavi Tiirik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 2:07 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [OS-webwork] conditional validation in ww2?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Is it possible to do kind of conditional validation in ww2?
> > Just started to like this xml way of configuring validation 
> > but I would like to turn off some of the validation rules if 
> > the form is not yet executed. This is needed because I do not 
> > want to see field validation error messages when I first open 
> > the form.
> > 
> > One way to achieve this would be using two actions. One
> > for displaying the form and another one for processing it.
> > Is there a better way of doing it?
> > 
> > thanks,
> > taavi.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
> > Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it 
> > help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us 
> > help YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
> > 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
> Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
> help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
> YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
> _______________________________________________
> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
> Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
> help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
> YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
> _______________________________________________
> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
> 


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork

Reply via email to