On Dec 24, 2003, at 12:37 AM, Hani Suleiman wrote:
I'll wait until the new year to give people a chance to comment one way or another. To be honest currently I'm leaning towards folding the pell code into webwork. Sure it's extra code to maintain, but it's very very rare that multipart parsing will change. Pell is stable enough that we can just suck it in and have the freedom of making changes to it in a webwork consistent way (as well as removing all sorts of cruft that is not needed by webwork)
Another benefit would be that it's one less jar to ship! The 'standard' pell will still be supported, of course, but will not support progress notifications. If/when other libraries provide this listener functionality, it's trivial to modify the webwork adapter class for that library to hook in the progress stuff.
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
