On Tuesday 04 March 2008 01:37, Jan-Oliver Wagner wrote: > before starting to work on Change Request #4 > (http://www.openvas.org/openvas-cr-4.html) > we should think about wether to simply change NTP 1.1/1.2 > or whether to be 100% clean and invent a new protocol (e.g. otp '1.0' or > '1.3'). > My preference currently is to go the simple way and just say that OpenVAS > does not implement the full set of NTP 1.1/1.2.
That would also be my preference. Note that we could stay completely compatible by pretending the server simply doesn't allow plugin upload. That would mean to keep the code that reads the plugin sent by the user and to always send the PLUGIN_DENIED response (see plugin_recv in openvas-server/openvasd/pluginupload.c). Bernhard -- Bernhard Herzog Intevation GmbH, Osnabrück Amtsgericht Osnabrück, HR B 18998 http://www.intevation.de/ Geschäftsführer: Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner
pgpf8XzJ6nrj6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Openvas-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/openvas-devel
