Am Dienstag 11 August 2009 schrieb Michael Meyer: > | m...@kira:~ % telnet usrportage.de 25 > | Trying 78.46.69.2... > | Connected to usrportage.de. > | Escape character is '^]'. > | 220 milch.schokokeks.org ESMTP > | helo localhost > | 250 milch.schokokeks.org Ok. > | MAIL FROM: <m...@usrportage.de> > | 250 Ok. > | RCPT TO: <mime%gmx...@usrportage.de> > | 250 Ok. > | DATA > | 354 Ok. > | FROM: <m...@usrportage.de> > | To: <mime%gmx...@usrportage.de> > | Subject: test > | > | test > | . > | 250 Ok. 000000004A813915.000053F2 > | quit > | 221 Bye. > | Connection closed by foreign host > > `---| > > Somebody should have a look in the logs to see what happend with > the Mail with ID "000000004A813915.000053F2". Because this Mail was > accepted, this host was recognized as an open relay, even if the mail > was discarded internal. The Script could not detect that. ;-) > The mail never arrived here, so i think it was truly discarded > internal.
In fact the mail was delivered, as the domain contains a catchall. Is there any reason mime%gmx...@usrportage.de should be delivered to gmx? I see this as a completely valid mail adress on usrportage.de. -- Hanno Böck Blog: http://www.hboeck.de/ GPG: 3DBD3B20 Jabber/Mail: ha...@hboeck.de http://schokokeks.org - professional webhosting
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Openvas-devel mailing list Openvas-devel@wald.intevation.org http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/openvas-devel
