*** Hanno Böck <ha...@hboeck.de> wrote: > Am Dienstag 11 August 2009 schrieb Michael Meyer:
> > Somebody should have a look in the logs to see what happend with > > the Mail with ID "000000004A813915.000053F2". Because this Mail was > > accepted, this host was recognized as an open relay, even if the mail > > was discarded internal. The Script could not detect that. ;-) > > The mail never arrived here, so i think it was truly discarded > > internal. > > In fact the mail was delivered, as the domain contains a catchall. > Is there any reason mime%gmx...@usrportage.de should be delivered to gmx? I > see this as a completely valid mail adress on usrportage.de. As I wrote: http://www.remote.org/jochen/mail/info/address.html#percenthack "The so called percent hack is another form of source route." http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-software-2/percenthack-590943/ http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?p=6240078 http://www.issociate.de/board/goto/1205434/Percent_Hack.html http://web.nps.navy.mil/~miller/percent-hack.html http://www.spamsoap.com/smtp-open-relay-test/ Micha _______________________________________________ Openvas-devel mailing list Openvas-devel@wald.intevation.org http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/openvas-devel
