On May 25, 20
> not sure whether there is a misunderstanding here: The list I posted
> named proprietary plugins we are missing to reactivate GPL plugins. So
> it is even absolutely correct the veritas*.nasl appear on this list.

My mistake then :)

Note that contrarily to what is said there, a missing dependency does  
not deactivate a plugin -- the plugin will run nevertheless, but  
there will be less info in the KB. While in some cases it means the  
plugin will not run (ie: if it depends on a specific KB item), in  
most cases it will run fine.
For instance, the absence of the httpver.nasl plugin does not  
deactivate all the http-related plugins, they'll just assume that the  
remote web server is at least speaking HTTP/1.0.


                                        -- Renaud
_______________________________________________
Openvas-discuss mailing list
Openvas-discuss@wald.intevation.org
http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss

Reply via email to