My apologies and +1 with your analysis.
Le 03/03/2013 11:39, Reindl Harald a écrit :
you did not understand what i say
look, i am using Fedora in production
but i am far away to call it a "professional distribution"
for anybody but me and the same is with gentoo, someone
can use it but if you want not make people laugh avoid
to say "for professional distributions like gentoo"
Am 03.03.2013 11:27, schrieb Sebastien Aucouturier:
argh ....
i was not happy to see the message telling not to use openvas on
gentoo,
but i do not more agree with this message complying about gentoo...
hey guys ... use the linux os you want, but do not blame ones that
others use and that is not the same of yours.
And at the end what i want to say :
Thanks to greenbone,secpod, securityspace,.. openvas is an open
development, if you want things in, put your
hands on ... and share your works.
dont try using it in professional distributions like gentoo or
slackware,
*rofl*...you made my day
mine too :-)
how do you see something is not for professional use?
when it takes hours to update the kernel instead seconds
and if it has only a laughable package management
why?
because if you use your comuter in a professional way
time is money and a support contract for gentoo does
also not exist
_______________________________________________
Openvas-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss
--
"Le saviez-vous ? la technologie d'ITrust va sécuriser le cloud
français"
| Sébastien AUCOUTURIER | Responsable R&D
| ITrust | 55 L'Occitane 31670 LABEGE
| Email: [email protected]
| Fixe Sdt. 05.67.34.67.80
| IT Security Services & SaaS Editor
_______________________________________________
Openvas-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss
