On Donnerstag, 16. Mai 2013, Geoff Galitz wrote: > It should be more descriptive of what it actually does or is for, I think. > IMO something more along the lines of "Basic" is appropriate. > > "Recommended" or "Best Practice" imply there is something unusual about > the scan profiles.
I had "Basic" on my list, but it implies "imcomplete". The Full&Fast scan is complete. F&F is configured to be best balance between depth and duration. Personally I don't associate "Best practice" with "unusual", actually I associate the opposite. "Recommended" is IMHO not neutral enough. (Who recommends? And why?) -- Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner | ++49-541-335084-0 | http://www.greenbone.net/ Greenbone Networks GmbH, Neuer Graben 17, 49074 Osnabrück | AG Osnabrück, HR B 202460 Geschäftsführer: Lukas Grunwald, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner _______________________________________________ Openvas-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss
