How about defining levels and using Level I, Level II and so on as descriptors?
Thanks Alex On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Jan-Oliver Wagner < [email protected]> wrote: > On Donnerstag, 16. Mai 2013, Geoff Galitz wrote: > > It should be more descriptive of what it actually does or is for, I > think. > > IMO something more along the lines of "Basic" is appropriate. > > > > "Recommended" or "Best Practice" imply there is something unusual about > > the scan profiles. > > I had "Basic" on my list, but it implies "imcomplete". The Full&Fast > scan is complete. F&F is configured to be best balance between > depth and duration. > > Personally I don't associate "Best practice" with "unusual", actually > I associate the opposite. > > "Recommended" is IMHO not neutral enough. (Who recommends? And why?) > > -- > Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner | ++49-541-335084-0 | http://www.greenbone.net/ > Greenbone Networks GmbH, Neuer Graben 17, 49074 Osnabrück | AG Osnabrück, > HR B 202460 > Geschäftsführer: Lukas Grunwald, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner > _______________________________________________ > Openvas-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss >
_______________________________________________ Openvas-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss
