On Mittwoch, 11. Dezember 2013, Jagannath Naidu wrote: > I was a QualysGuard user and decided to use the opensource. > I am new to openvas and have been checking the functionality of it. > I installed the openvas on a centos minimal, 64 bit. It works well and > results are good. > > The only problem where I am stuck is that it shows very less details when > scanning any MS Windows target. > > As compared to the QualysGuard scan it is negligible. > > Do I have to install any commercial feeds or am I missing any configuration.
The latter. The question is: which one? > When I scan a RHEL target, it shows results about 160(96 high, 27 med, 45 > low, and remaining logs) > When I scan a Windows target, it shows 40 (1 high, 3 med, 4 low). It'll be more interesting to compare scans of Windows with two different products. > I provided smb credentials for windows target and ssh credentials for linux > target. Have you checked the log output of NVT 1.3.6.1.4.1.25623.1.0.90023 (SMB Authorization) on whether a successful login happened? -- Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner | ++49-541-335084-0 | http://www.greenbone.net/ Greenbone Networks GmbH, Neuer Graben 17, 49074 Osnabrück | AG Osnabrück, HR B 202460 Geschäftsführer: Lukas Grunwald, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner _______________________________________________ Openvas-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss
