> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Tim Brown > Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2010 7:31 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Openvas-plugins] MS-RPC for GSoC > > On Monday 01 March 2010 11:05:08 Jonas Andradas wrote: > > Hello, > > > > 2010/2/27 Vlatko Kosturjak <[email protected]> > > > > > [...] > > > > > > Totally agree. OpenVAS was focusing too much on local checks > > > recently. I would definitively vote for this as we need > to improve > > > remote checks in OpenVAS. > > > > > > Sooner the better... > > > > > > Kost > > > > At the company I work for, we do auditing services, among > other things. > > Currently we are using Nessus, and I am introducing OpenVAS > gradually. > > All progress at improving remote checks with no credentials > > (identifying services, versions, remote vulnerabilities) > would help in > > OpenVAS replacing Nessus :) > > > > GSOC projects on this, I think could be very useful to the project. > > There's no reason why we can't add more bindings to OpenVAS > for the Samba libraries (and others). This is what we agreed > at DevCon 2. Fact is that whilst SSH/SMB code exists in > NASL, it is a massive pain in the ass to keep maintaining it. > I would support a GSoC project to work on Samba integration.
I prefer that too. We are working on getting NTLMSSP part from Samba already, though for authenticated tests, we should do the same here as well. Chandra. _______________________________________________ Openvas-plugins mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/openvas-plugins
