On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 14:01 +0000, Tim Brown wrote: > There's no reason why we can't add more bindings to OpenVAS for the Samba > libraries (and others). This is what we agreed at DevCon 2. Fact is that > whilst SSH/SMB code exists in NASL, it is a massive pain in the ass to keep > maintaining it. I would support a GSoC project to work on Samba integration. > > Tim
I agree that maintenance would be painful and also wouldn't mind working on Samba integration. Regards, Dražen. -- Laboratory for Systems and Signals Department of Electronic Systems and Information Processing Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing University of Zagreb _______________________________________________ Openvas-plugins mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/openvas-plugins
