On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 08:36:56AM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: > This particular change looks a lot like "feature missing for > deployment/integration/...".
but why add features in a 'release candidate'? what speaks against releasing small releases with stuff like this? 2.1.x ? If the RC is good enough to have features added, why not get it out of the door? For us, we're still stuck with 2.0.9 regarding what we can ship to customers, since they will confront us with the question "why are you deploying not-released-software" if shit hits the fan... It is a bullshit-argumentation, I'm aware for that, but regarding liability, it is a matter :/ felix
pgppMMd10l92s.pgp
Description: PGP signature
