Hello, > If the RC is good enough to have features added, why not get > it out of the door? For us, we're still stuck with 2.0.9 regarding > what we can ship to customers, since they will confront us with > the question "why are you deploying not-released-software" if > shit hits the fan... > It is a bullshit-argumentation, I'm aware for that, but regarding > liability, it is a matter :/
I couldn't agree more with Felix. IMHO RCs should always be just bugfix releases with a freezed feature set. I really don't see why other bounties can't go into 2.1.1 or something. I guess the coders don't code any faster if they add features to 2.1 instead to 2.1.1? The last feature added - "feature missing for deployment/integration"? I don't think so. I am deploying the development version since beta_7 and I never *needed* to use any of those new features except Vista compatibility feature, which is not present in 2.0.x. It sucks to deploy beta/RC software, though. However, thanks to developers for OpenVPN. Bye, Nejc
