On 03/10/2010 11:37:57 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
> On 10/03/10 18:26, Peter Stuge wrote:
> > The only way autoconf on that RHEL4.6 would be relevant is if those
> > RHEL4.6 systems strictly need to build directly from git source, as
> > opposed to building from a prepared tarball. Is that the case?
>
> I will get that clarified on the meeting tomorrow, as this might be a
> scenario. But to be honest, I have troubles seeing that people want
> to
> do active development on RHEL4.6, at least do changes which require
> changing autotools files or pulling down SVN or git trees.
And, to reiterate, applying patches within an rpm
spec file is normal, expected, and part of the
rpm design so a certain level of "development" is supported.
Karl <k...@meme.com>
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
-- Robert A. Heinlein
