On 04/26/2010 03:56:16 AM, Davide Brini wrote: > On Monday 26 Apr 2010 00:13:39 David Sommerseth wrote:
> > > +# OCSP responder URL (mandatory) > > > +ocsp_url="http://some.ocsp.server/"; > > > +#ocsp_url="https://some.secure.ocsp.server/"; > > > > Wouldn't it be better to use a more valid URL? > > And what could it be? I can put in the OCSP URL of some well-known > CA, > but > then if the user is using their own server, that would be meaningless > anyway. > But I'm open to suggestions. I would suggest example.com, which would be compliant with RFC 2606 "Reserved Top Level DNS Names". Karl <k...@meme.com> Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward." -- Robert A. Heinlein
