David Sommerseth <open...@sf.lists.topphemmelig.net> on Sat, 2017/02/18 02:52: > On 17/02/17 22:59, Emmanuel Deloget wrote: > > I'm not targetting 2.4 -- my work is done on the current master. Adding > > hundreds of lines to the current 2.4 for the purpose of supporting a > > library which is not yet present on the user systems does not make much > > sense :) > > Currently, master and release/2.4 are fairly close ... so it shouldn't > be too hard to cherry-pick stuff from master (which we usually prefer to > do). > > With that said ... I know Fedora have OpenSSL v1.1 support on their wish > list for for OpenVPN [1] and I believe Arch Linux guys have also been > asking about this too. So the more leading edge distros are moving > towards OpenSSL v1.1 as fast as possible
Arch Linux guy started this thread. ;)
Would be great to have openssl 1.1.0 support in master soon. Maintaining
backported patches downstream should not be a problem.
From my point of view having support for openssl 1.1.0 in release/2.4 would
be even better to minimize packaging workload.
--
main(a){char*c=/* Schoene Gruesse */"B?IJj;MEH"
"CX:;",b;for(a/* Best regards my address: */=0;b=c[a++];)
putchar(b-1/(/* Chris cc -ox -xc - && ./x */b/42*2-3)*42);}
pgpTx8wUzeaW0.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-devel mailing list Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel
