David Sommerseth <open...@sf.lists.topphemmelig.net> on Sat, 2017/02/18 02:52:
> On 17/02/17 22:59, Emmanuel Deloget wrote:
> > I'm not targetting 2.4 -- my work is done on the current master. Adding
> > hundreds of lines to the current 2.4 for the purpose of supporting a
> > library which is not yet present on the user systems does not make much
> > sense :)  
> Currently, master and release/2.4 are fairly close ... so it shouldn't
> be too hard to cherry-pick stuff from master (which we usually prefer to
> do).
> With that said ... I know Fedora have OpenSSL v1.1 support on their wish
> list for for OpenVPN [1] and I believe Arch Linux guys have also been
> asking about this too.  So the more leading edge distros are moving
> towards OpenSSL v1.1 as fast as possible

Arch Linux guy started this thread. ;)

Would be great to have openssl 1.1.0 support in master soon. Maintaining
backported patches downstream should not be a problem.

From my point of view having support for openssl 1.1.0 in release/2.4 would
be even better to minimize packaging workload.
main(a){char*c=/*    Schoene Gruesse                         */"B?IJj;MEH"
"CX:;",b;for(a/*    Best regards             my address:    */=0;b=c[a++];)
putchar(b-1/(/*    Chris            cc -ox -xc - && ./x    */b/42*2-3)*42);}

Attachment: pgpTx8wUzeaW0.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
Openvpn-devel mailing list

Reply via email to