Hi,

On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 12:21:58PM -0500, Selva Nair wrote:
> A quick comment regarding item 2 in topics:
> > 2 mgmt version 2 / pk-sign and 2.4
> >  Is this something we want in 2.4? If not, how's the GUI going to deal with 
> > 2.4 and master being different?"
> 
> Unless 2.4 is getting EC cert external signing support, we do not need
> this in there, do we?
>
> I think it shouldn't be a problem for UI's as the master will behave
> the same way as 2.4 towards old UI's. New/updated UI's are expected to
> first check the management version of the daemon, then optionally
> announce version 2 support, and be prepared to handle old and
> new-style requests.

This is the part I was missing - that the GUI knows what version the
openvpn.exe process can handle.  So a "master GUI" would send "version 2",
while a "2.4 GUI" would see "openvpn.exe can only do 1" and send "version".

Good - that basically concludes the topic for tomorrow :-) (unless someone
convinces me that we want EC cert external signing in 2.4)

> Anyway, "The Windows GUI" doesn't care as it does not handle signature
> requests. Jonathan said the same about Tunneblick.

Oh?  I missed that part.  So who is using --management-external-key, then,
if neither of the "two main GUIs" are doing it?

gert

-- 
now what should I write here...

Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             g...@greenie.muc.de

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Openvpn-devel mailing list
Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel

Reply via email to