Hi, On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 08:40:31PM +0100, Steffan Karger wrote: > We could revert to an older version of the macro we ship, or to a > simpler (though less clear) AC_CHECK_COMPILE-based check. > > I'm tempted to ditch the macro and go for the AC_CHECK_COMPILE.
The macro seems to be more painful than expected - so I tend to agree with you :-) - patches welcome. Though with the state of the sf.net list, patch handling is quite annoying :-/ (read: some mails get through, some mails take ages, patchwork isn't seeing stuff, the list archive isn't seeing stuff that I could reference on merging, etc. - gah) gert -- now what should I write here... Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-devel mailing list Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel
