On Sun, Jun 03, 2018 at 12:48:36PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 03, 2018 at 12:11:57PM +0200, Steffan Karger wrote:
> > A server should not push us compression algorithms we didn't specify.  If
> > the server does so anyway, reject the compression algorithm.
> I can see why you do this, but if I understand this right, this will
> break lots of currently-working OpenVPN setups - where we use the IV_
> variables to parse out "what can the client do?" and send matching
> "compress <foo>" PUSH_REPLYs.
> So, feature-NAK.

As clarified on IRC, I misread the text.  So I withdraw the feature-NAK
and need to read this more closely and better think through the problem


"If was one thing all people took for granted, was conviction that if you 
 feed honest figures into a computer, honest figures come out. Never doubted 
 it myself till I met a computer with a sense of humor."
                             Robert A. Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress

Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             g...@greenie.muc.de

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
Openvpn-devel mailing list

Reply via email to