Hi On Sun, Jun 03, 2018 at 12:48:36PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote: > On Sun, Jun 03, 2018 at 12:11:57PM +0200, Steffan Karger wrote: > > A server should not push us compression algorithms we didn't specify. If > > the server does so anyway, reject the compression algorithm. > > I can see why you do this, but if I understand this right, this will > break lots of currently-working OpenVPN setups - where we use the IV_ > variables to parse out "what can the client do?" and send matching > "compress <foo>" PUSH_REPLYs. > > So, feature-NAK.
As clarified on IRC, I misread the text. So I withdraw the feature-NAK
and need to read this more closely and better think through the problem
space.
gert
--
"If was one thing all people took for granted, was conviction that if you
feed honest figures into a computer, honest figures come out. Never doubted
it myself till I met a computer with a sense of humor."
Robert A. Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-devel mailing list Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel
