On Freitag, 24. Juni 2022 10:37:58 CEST Antonio Quartulli wrote: > + uint8_t *ptr = BPTR(&dco->dco_packet_in); > + uint8_t op = ptr[0] >> P_OPCODE_SHIFT; > + if (op == P_DATA_V2 || op == P_DATA_V2)
This looks odd. Seems you wanted to check for a second opcode, or is it obsolete? > + const char *reason = "(unknown reason by ovpn-dco)"; Wouldn't "ovpn-dco: unknown reason" be better? _______________________________________________ Openvpn-devel mailing list Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel
