Hi, On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 07:00:25PM +0200, Arne Schwabe wrote: > > I???ve pushed a fix for this panic in > > fd6b3bede5a5c210f327e5c9bd3e415ee905048b. > > I simply didn???t think that user space might give us a non-UDP socket, so > > checking for that and rejecting the peer in that case fixes the panic. > > Thanks for finding that. > > You should probably also modify the check for dco incompatible in > OpenVPN so that using TCP disables DCO on FreeBSD.
Indeed. One of the next patches will bring "per platform options check",
which would be a good place for the #ifdef TARGET_FREEBSD bits.
I'll see that I can pick part of that patch and apply it tomorrow
(the patch as posted refers to symbols that are brought in by the
"main" win-dco patch, but half of it should apply & make sense as is)
gert
--
"If was one thing all people took for granted, was conviction that if you
feed honest figures into a computer, honest figures come out. Never doubted
it myself till I met a computer with a sense of humor."
Robert A. Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-devel mailing list Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel
