I do claim that I have no idea about pkcs11-helper, but this patch
isn't *that* complex, just using the existing wrapper... but still
thanks to Frank for reviewing. I have test compiled on Gentoo with
"pkcs11-helper-1.27.0-r1", and "it compiled".
I *do* find this part a bit nonintuitive...
pkcs11_addProvider( ..., cert_private ? TRUE : FALSE)
.. we have a bool, pass it to a bool, and evaluate it in tri-state, to
pass true, if the bool is true, and false, if it is not... wat?
One day, someone should reformat the rest of pkcs11.c, though... this
stuff is outright ugly
msg(
M_INFO,
"PKCS#11: Adding PKCS#11 provider '%s'",
provider
);
(but I'm aware that OpenVPN had this phase when every function call
needed to be distributed to the maximum number of lines possible...)
Your patch has been applied to the master and release/2.6 branch.
commit b08f8cbb2b92f3ee0eced39d11665befea3aec87 (master)
commit f1995ccca4c105e71728101bb719d235f5605b33 (release/2.6)
Author: Marc Becker via Openvpn-devel
Date: Sun Dec 11 20:09:13 2022 +0100
unify code path for adding PKCS#11 providers
Signed-off-by: Marc Becker <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Frank Lichtenheld <[email protected]>
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
URL:
https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg25642.html
Signed-off-by: Gert Doering <[email protected]>
--
kind regards,
Gert Doering
_______________________________________________
Openvpn-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel