Hi, On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 06:35:35AM -0700, pg0...@fastmail.fm wrote: > checking the existing routes > > @Server > > ip route > default via S.S.S.1 dev eth0 > 10.0.0.0/24 dev tun0 proto kernel scope link src > 10.0.0.1 > S.S.S.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src > S.S.S.S > 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo scope link > 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 scope link > > I notice 2 things, > > @Server route is missing any 192.168.x.x routes. Seems to me that > should be there, right? If yes, where/how in this Openvpn config should > that be added?
If you add "route" statements to the openvpn config (which you need for
that) you need to restart the openvpn server.
> @Client, the "10.0.0.0/18 dev tun0" route seems an enexpectedly large
> address range, and in the logs, 'broadcast 191.0.0.182' seems an odd
> address.
>
> Mon Jul 7 05:44:59 2014 /usr/local/sbin/unpriv-ip addr add dev
> tun0 10.0.0.2/18 broadcast 191.0.0.182
>
> It's being assigned @ connect by the client
[..]
> Why the /18? Shouldn't it just be 10.0.0.0/24?
What do you have in your --server statement on the server side? This
is where this is coming from.
(Or it might come from "ifconfig-push". Remember that the second
"address" in ifconfig-push is really a netmask if you run topology subnet)
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
pgpzpyawNkUF3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-users mailing list Openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users
